·
The World Meteorological Organization
[10] has
suggested a possible link between global warming and increasing extreme weather
events, as have Hoyos et al. (2006), writing, "the increasing ...
number of category 4 and 5 hurricanes ... is directly linked to"
increasing temperatures. [11]
Hurricane modeling has produced similar results, e.g., "hurricanes,
simulated under warmer, high-CO2 conditions, are more intense ...
than under present-day conditions.... greenhouse gas–induced warming may lead
to ... increasing ... occurrence of highly destructive category-5 storms."
[12]
A paper by 14 scientists [13]
notes that "research shows very little evidence to support the claim that
the rising costs associated with weather ... are associated with changes in
[their] frequency or intensity." The IPCC
A
substantially higher risk of extreme weather does not necessarily mean a
noticeably greater risk of slightly-above-average weather [14].
However, the evidence is clear that severe weather and moderate rainfall are
also increasing.
Stephen Mwakifwamba, national co-ordinator of the Centre for Energy,
Environment, Science and Technology - which prepared the Tanzanian government's
climate change report to the UN - says that change is happening in Tanzania right
now. "In the past, we had a drought about every 10 years", he says.
"Now we just don't know when they will come. They are more frequent, but
then so are floods. The climate is far less predictable. We might have floods
in May or droughts every three years. Upland areas, which were never affected
by mosquitoes, now are. Water levels are decreasing every day. The rains come
at the wrong time for farmers and it is leading to many problems" [15]. Increasing water vapor .
As the
climate grows warmer, evaporation will increase. This may cause heavier rainfall and
more erosion,
and in more vulnerable tropical areas (especially in Africa), desertification
due to deforestation. Many scientists think that it
could result in more extreme weather as global warming progresses. The IPCC Third Annual
Report says: "...global average water vapour concentration and
precipitation are projected to increase during the 21st century. By the second
half of the 21st century, it is likely that precipitation will have increased
over northern mid- to high latitudes and Antarctica
in winter. At low latitudes there are both regional increases and decreases
over land areas. Larger year to year variations in precipitation are very
likely over most areas where an increase in mean precipitation is
projected" [16] [17].
The
economic impact of extreme weather is rising rapidly both because of increases
in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather and because of changes in
human behavior. An example of how human behavior has increased exposure to
extreme weather is the movement towards greater development along vulnerable
seacoasts. The economic impact of hurricanes has increased because there is
more development along seacoasts vulnerable to hurricanes. Similarly, the
economic impact of floods has increased because there is more development in
floodplains.
Choi
and Fisher, writing in Climate Change, vol. 58 (2003) pp. 149, predict that
each 1% increase in annual precipitation would enlarge the cost of catastrophic
storms by 2.8%.
The
Association of British Insurers has stated that limiting carbon emissions would
avoid 80% of the projected additional annual cost of tropical cyclones by the
2080s. The cost is also increasing partly because of building in exposed areas
such as coasts and floodplains. The
The first ever recorded South
Atlantic hurricane, "Catarina", hit Brazil in 2004. Although there has been
speculation
based on satellite intensity estimates that the lowest pressure in Monica (a
tropical cyclone which has since made its second Australia landfall) was lower
than Wilma's Atlantic basin record of 882 millibars in 2005 and perhaps even
Typhoon Tip's world record lowest measured pressure of 870 mb in 1979, with no
aircraft reconnaissance in Monica we'll never know for sure. Nor will we know
exactly what its winds were and whether some of the official figures that have
been cited were overestimations -- I'm always a little skeptical of tropical
cyclone winds estimated to be in excess of 200 mph, even in gusts -- but Monica
sure was one mighty impressive tropical cyclone at its peak! And unprecedented in the Southern hemisphere.
In the northern hemisphere, the southern part of the Arctic region (home
to 4,000,000 people) has experienced a temperature rise 1° to 3° Celsius over
the last 50 years. Canada,
Alaska and Russia are
experiencing initial melting of permafrost.
This may disrupt ecosystems and by increasing bacterial activity in the soil
lead to these areas becoming carbon sources instead of carbon
sinks [19]. A study
(published in Science) of changes to eastern Siberia's permafrost
suggests that it is gradually disappearing in the southern regions, leading to
the loss of nearly 11% of Siberia's nearly 11,000 lakes since 1971 [20].
At the same time, western Siberia is at the initial stage where melting
permafrost is creating new lakes, which will eventually start disappearing as
in the east. Western Siberia is the world's largest peat bog, and
the melting of its permafrost is likely to lead to the release, over decades,
of large quantities of methane—creating an additional source of greenhouse gas
emissions [21].
Hurricanes were thought to be an entirely north Atlantic
phenomenon. In April 2004, the first Atlantic hurricane to form south of the
Equator hit Brazil
with 40 m/s (144 km/h) winds; monitoring systems may have to be extended 1,600
km (1000 miles) further south [22].
Main article: sea
level rise.
With increasing average global temperature, the water in the oceans
expands in volume, and additional water enters them which had previously been
locked up on land in glaciers and the polar
ice caps. An increase of 1.5 to 4.5 °C is estimated to lead to an increase
of 15 to 95 cm (IPCC 2001).
The sea level has risen more than 120 metres since the peak
of the last ice
age about 18,000 years ago. The bulk of that occurred before 6000 years
ago. From 3000 years ago to the start of the 19th century, sea level was almost
constant, rising at 0.1 to 0.2 mm/yr; since 1900, the level has risen at 1–2 mm/yr [23]; since 1992, satellite
altimetry from TOPEX/Poseidon indicates a rate of about 3 mm/yr [24].
The
temperature of the Antarctic Southern
Ocean rose by 0.17 °C (0.31 °F) between the 1950s and the 1980s, nearly
twice the rate for the world's oceans as a whole [25].
As well as effects on ecosystems (eg by melting sea ice, affecting algae that
grow on its underside), warming could reduce the ocean's ability to absorb CO2.
More
important for the United States may be the temperature rise in the Gulf
of Mexico. As hurricanes cross the warm Loop
Current coming up from South America, they can gain great strength in under
a day (as did Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane
Rita in 2005),
with water above 85 degrees F seemingly promoting Category 5 storms.
Main article: ocean acidification.
The
world’s oceans soak up much of the carbon dioxide produced by living organisms,
either as dissolved gas, or in the skeletons of tiny marine creatures that fall
to the bottom to become chalk or limestone. Oceans currently absorb about one
metric tonne of CO2 per person per year. It is estimated that the
oceans have absorbed around half of all CO2 generated by human
activities since 1800 (120,000,000,000 tonnes or 120 petagrams of
carbon) [26].
But in
water, carbon dioxide becomes a weak carbonic
acid, and the increase in the greenhouse gas since the industrial revolution has already lowered the
average pH (the
laboratory measure of acidity) of seawater by 0.1 units on the 14-point scale,
to 8.2. Predicted emissions could lower it by a further 0.5 by 2100, to a level
not seen for millions of years.[27]
There
are concerns that increasing acidification could have a particularly
detrimental effect on corals
[28]
(16% of the world's coral reefs have died from bleaching since 1998 [29])
and other marine organisms with calcium
carbonate shells. Increased acidity may also directly affect the growth and
reproduction of fish as well as the plankton on
which they rely on for food [30].
Main article: Shutdown of thermohaline
circulation.
There
is some speculation that global warming could, via a shutdown or slowdown of
the thermohaline circulation, trigger localised cooling in the North Atlantic
and lead to cooling, or lesser warming, in that region. This would affect in
particular areas like Scandinavia and Britain
that are warmed by the North Atlantic drift. The chances of this
occurring are unclear; there is some evidence for the stability of the Gulf
Stream and possible weakening of the North Atlantic drift. There is, however,
no evidence for cooling in northern Europe or nearby seas; quite the reverse.
Rising
temperatures are beginning to impact on ecosystems. Butterflies
have shifted their ranges northward by 200 km in Europe and North America.
Plants lag behind, and larger animals' migration is slowed down by cities and
highways. In Britain, spring butterflies are appearing an average of 6 days
earlier than two decades ago [31].
In the Arctic, the waters of Hudson Bay are ice-free for three weeks longer than they
were thirty years ago, affecting polar bears,
which do not hunt on land [32].
Two
2002 studies in Nature (vol 421) [33]
surveyed the scientific literature to find recent changes in range or seasonal
behaviour by plant and animal species. Of species showing recent change, 4 out
of 5 shifted their ranges towards the poles or higher altitudes, creating
"refugee species".
Frogs were breeding, flowers blossoming and birds migrating an average 2.3 days
earlier each decade; butterflies, birds and plants moving towards the poles by
6.1 km per decade [34].
A 2005 study concludes human activity is the cause of the temperature rise and
resultant changing species behaviour, and links these effects with the
predictions of climate models to provide validation for them [35]. Grass has become
established in Antarctica for the first time. [36]
Forests
in some regions potentially face an increased risk of forest
fires. The 10-year average of boreal forest burned in North America, after
several decades of around 10,000 km² (2.5 million acres), has increased
steadily since 1970 to more than 28,000 km² (7 million acres) annually. [37].
This change may be due in part to changes in forest management practices.
Increasing
average temperature and carbon dioxide may have the effect, up to a point, of
improving ecosystems' productivity. Atmospheric carbon dioxide is rare in
comparison to oxygen (less than 1% of air compared to 21% of air). This carbon
dioxide starvation becomes apparent in photorespiration,
where there is so little carbon dioxide, that oxygen can enter a plant's chloroplasts
and takes the place where carbon dioxide normally would be in the Calvin
Cycle. This causes the sugars being made to be destroyed, badly suppressing
growth. Satellite data shows that the productivity of the northern hemisphere
has increased since 1982 (although attribution of this increase to a specific
cause is difficult).
IPCC
models predict that higher CO2 concentrations would only spur growth
of flora up to a point, because in many regions the limiting factors are water
or nutrients, not temperature or CO2; after that, greenhouse effects
and warming would continue but there would be no compensatory increase in
growth.
Research
done by the Swiss Canopy Crane
Project suggests that slow-growing trees only are stimulated in growth for
a short period under higher CO2 levels, while faster growing plants
like liana benefit
in the long term. In general, but especially in rain
forests, this means that liana become the prevalent species; and because
they decompose much faster than trees their carbon content is more quickly
returned to the atmosphere. Slow growing trees incorporate atmospheric carbon
for decades.
A map of the change in thickness of mountain glaciers since 1970. Thinning
in orange and red, thickening in blue.
Lewis Glacier, North Cascades, WA USA is one of five glaciers in the area
that melted away
In
historic times, glaciers grew during the Little
Ice Age, a cool period from about 1550 to 1850. Subsequently, until about
1940, glaciers around the world retreated as climate warmed. Glacier retreat declined and
reversed, in many cases, from 1950 to 1980 as a slight global cooling occurred.
Since 1980, glacier retreat has become increasingly rapid and ubiquitous, so
much so that it has threatened the existence of many of the glaciers of the
world. This process has increased markedly since 1995. [38]
The
total surface area of glaciers worldwide has decreased by 50% since the end of the
19th century [39].
Currently glacier retreat rates and mass balance losses have been increasing in
the Andes, Alps, Himalaya's, Rocky Mountains and North Cascades. As of March
2005, the snow cap that has covered the top of Mount
Kilimanjaro for the past 11,000 years since the last ice age has
almost disappeared [40].
The
loss of glaciers not only directly causes landslides, flash floods and glacial
lake overflow[41], but also increases
annual variation in water flows in rivers. Glacier runoff declines in the
summer as glaciers decrease in size, this decline is already observable in
several regions [42].
Glaciers retain water on mountains in high precipitation years, since the snow
cover accumulating on glaciers protects the ice from melting. In warmer and
drier years, glaciers offset the lower precipitation amounts with a higher
meltwater input [43].
The
recession of mountain glaciers, notably in Western North America, Franz-Josef
Land, Asia, the Alps, Indonesia and Africa, and tropical and sub-tropical
regions of South America, has been used to provide qualitative support to the
rise in global temperatures since the late 19th century. Many glaciers are
being lost to melting further raising concerns about future local water
resources in these glacierized areas. The Lewis Glacier, North Cascades
pictured at right after melting away in 1990 is one of the 47 North Cascade
glaciers observed and all are retreating [44].
Despite
their proximity and importance to human populations, the mountain and valley
glaciers of temperate latitudes amount to a small fraction of glacial ice on
the earth. About 99% is in the great ice sheets of polar and subpolar
Antarctica and Greenland. These continuous continental-scale ice sheets, 3 km
(1.8 miles) or more in thickness, cap the polar and subpolar land masses. Like
rivers flowing from an enormous lake, numerous outlet glaciers transport ice
from the margins of the ice sheet to the ocean.
Glacier
retreat has been observed in these outlet glaciers, resulting in an increase of
the ice flow rate. In Greenland the period since the year 2000 has brought
retreat to several very large glaciers that had long been stable. Three
glaciers that have been researched, Helheim, Jakobshavns and Kangerdlugssuaq
Glaciers, jointly drain more than 16% of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Satellite
images and aerial photographs from the 1950s and 1970s show that the front of
the glacier had remained in the same place for decades. But in 2001 it began
retreating rapidly, retreating 7.2 km (4.5 miles) between 2001 and 2005. It has
also accelerated from 20 m (65 ft)/day to 32 m (104 ft)/day.[45] Jakobshavn Isbræ in west Greenland is generally
considered the fastest moving glacier in the world. It had been moving
continuously at speeds of over 24 m (78 ft)/day with a stable terminus since at
least 1950. In 2002, the 12 km (7.5 mile) long floating terminus entered a
phase of rapid retreat. The ice front started to break up and the floating
terminus disintegrated accelerating to a retreat rate of over 30 m (98 ft)/day.
The acceleration rate of retreat of Kangerdlugssuaq Glacier is even larger.
Portions of the main trunk that were flowing at 15 m (49 ft)/day in 1988-2001
were flowing at 40 m (131 ft)/day in summer 2005. The front of the glacier has
also retreated and has rapidly thinned by more than 100 m (328 ft).[46]
Glacier
retreat and acceleration is also apparent on two important outlet glaciers of
the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Pine Island Glacier, which flows into the
Amundsen Sea thinned 3.5 ± 0.9 m (11.5 ± 3 ft) per year and retreated five
kilometers (3.1 miles) in 3.8 years. The terminus of the glacier is a floating
ice shelf and the point at which it is afloat is retreating 1.2 km/year. This
glacier drains a substantial portion of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet and has
been referred to as the weak underbelly of this ice sheet.[47]
This same pattern of thinning is evident on the neighboring Thwaites Glacier.
Some
effects of global warming themselves contribute directly to further global
warming.
Wikinews
has news related to:
Scientists
warn thawing Siberia may trigger global meltdown
Climate
scientists reported in August 2005 that a one million square kilometer region of permafrost peat bogs in
western Siberia
is starting to melt for the first time since it was formed 11,000 years ago at
the end of the last ice age. This will release methane, an
extremely effective greenhouse gas, possibly as much as 70,000 million tonnes, over the next
few decades. An earlier report in May 2005 reported similar
melting in eastern Siberia [48].
This positive
feedback was not known about in 2001 when the IPCC issued its last major report on climate change. The
discovery of permafrost peat bogs melting in 2005 implies that warming is
likely to happen faster than was predicted in 2001.
There
have been predictions, and some evidence, that global warming might cause loss
of carbon from terrestrial ecosystems, leading to an increase of atmospheric CO2
levels. Several climate models indicate that global warming through the 21st
could be accelerated by the response of the terrestrial carbon cycle to such
warming [49].
The strongest feedbacks in these cases are due to increased respiration of
carbon from soils throughout the high latitude boreal forests of the
Northern Hemisphere. One model in particular (HadCM3) indicates a
secondary carbon cycle feedback due to the loss of much of the Amazon
rainforest in response to significantly reduced precipitation over tropical
South America [50].
While models disagree on the strength of any terrestrial carbon cycle feedback,
they each suggest any such feedback would accelerate global warming.
Observations
show that soils in England have been losing carbon at the rate of four million
tonnes a year for the past 25 years [51]
according to a paper in Nature by Bellamy et al. in September 2005, who note
that these results are unlikely to be explained by land use changes. Results
such as this rely on a dense sampling network and thus are not available on a
global scale. Extrapolating to all of the United Kingdom, they estimate annual
losses of 13 million tons per year. This is as much as the annual reductions in
carbon dioxide emissions achieved by the UK under the Kyoto Treaty (12.7
million tons of carbon per year).[52]
Rising
Global temperature might cause forest fires to occur on larger scale, and more
regularly. This releases more stored carbon into the atmosphere than the carbon
cycle can naturally re-absorb, as well as reducing the overall forest area on
the planet, creating a positive feedback loop. Part of that feedback loop is
more rapid growth of replacement forests and a northward migration of forests
as northern latitudes become more suitable climates for sustaining forests.
There is a question of whether the burning of renewable fuels such as forests
should be counted as contributing to global warming.
(Climate Roulette: Loss of
Carbon Sinks & Positive Feedbacks)
(EPA:
Global Warming: Impacts: Forests)
(Feedback
Cycles linking forests, climate and landuse activities)
See
also Mitigation of global warming
In
addition to direct damages from extreme
weather, there are other economic effects of global warming.
Main article: Global warming and agriculture.
For
some time it was hoped that a positive effect of global warming would be
increased agricultural yields, because of the role of carbon dioxide in photosynthesis,
especially in preventing photorespiration, which is responsible for
significant destruction of several crops. In Iceland, rising
temperatures have made possible the widespread sowing of barley, which was
untenable twenty years ago. Some of the warming is due to a local (possibly
temporary) effect via ocean currents from the Caribbean, which have also
affected fish stocks [53].
Whilst
local benefits may be felt in some regions (such as Siberia), recent
evidence is that global yields will be negatively affected. "Rising
atmospheric temperatures, longer droughts and side-effects of both, such as
higher levels of ground-level ozone gas, are likely to bring about a
substantial reduction in crop yields in the coming decades, large-scale
experiments have shown" (The
Independent, April 27, 2005, "Climate change poses threat to food
supply, scientists say" - report on this event).
Moreover,
the region likely to be worst affected is Africa, both
because its geography makes it particularly vulnerable, and because seventy per
cent of the population rely on rain-fed agriculture for their livelihoods.
Tanzania's official report on climate change suggests that the areas that
usually get two rainfalls in the year will probably get more, and those that
get only one rainy season will get far less. The net result is expected to be
that 33% less maize—the country's staple crop—will be grown [54].
An
industry very directly affected by the risks is the insurance
industry; the number of major natural disasters has trebled since the 1960s,
and insured losses increased fifteen-fold in real terms (adjusted for
inflation) [55].
According to one study, 35–40% of the worst catastrophes have been climate
change related (ERM, 2002). Over the past three decades, the proportion of the
global population affected by weather-related disasters has doubled in linear
trend, rising from roughly 2% in 1975 to 4% in 2001 (ERM, 2002).
A June 2004
report by the Association of British Insurers declared "Climate change
is not a remote issue for future generations to deal with. It is, in various
forms, here already, impacting on insurers' businesses now". It noted that
weather risks for households and property were already increasing by 2-4 % per
year due to changing weather, and that claims for storm and flood damages in
the UK had doubled to over £6 billion over the period 1998–2003, compared to
the previous five years. The results are rising insurance premiums, and the
risk that in some areas flood risk insurance
will become unaffordable for some.
In the
United States, insurance losses have also greatly increased, but according to
one study those increases are attributed to increased population and property
values in vulnerable coastal areas.(Science, 284, 1943-1947).
Roads,
airport runways, railway lines and pipelines, (including oil
pipelines, sewers,
water
mains etc) may require increased maintenance and renewal as they become
subject to greater temperature variation, and, in areas with permafrost,
subject to subsidence
[56].
For
historical reasons to do with trade, many of the world's largest and most prosperous cities
are on the coast, and the cost of building better coastal
defenses (due to the rising sea level) is likely to be considerable. Some
countries will be more affected than others - low-lying countries such as Bangladesh
and the Netherlands
would be worst hit by any sea level rise, in terms of floods or the cost
of preventing them.
In
developing countries, the poorest often live on flood plains, because it is the
only available space, or fertile agricultural land. These settlements often
lack infrastructure such as dykes and early warning systems. Poorer communities
also tend to lack the insurance, savings or access to credit needed to recover
from disasters [57].
Some Pacific
Ocean island nations, such as Tuvalu, are concerned about the possibility of an eventual
evacuation, as flood defense may become economically inviable for them. Tuvalu
already has an ad hoc agreement with New Zealand
to allow phased relocation [58].
In the
1990s a variety of estimates placed the number of environmental
refugees at around 25 million. (Environmental refugees are not
included in the official definition of refugees, which
only includes migrants fleeing persecution.) The Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC), which advises the world’s governments under the auspices
of the UN, estimated that 150 million environmental refugees will exist in the
year 2050, due mainly to the effects of coastal flooding, shoreline erosion and
agricultural disruption. (150 million means 1.5 percent of 2050’s predicted 10
billion world population.)[59]
Melting
Arctic ice may
open the Northwest Passage in summer, which would cut
5,000 nautical
miles (9,000 km) from shipping routes between Europe and Asia. This would
be of particular relevance for supertankers which are too big to fit through
the Panama
Canal and currently have to go around the tip of South America. According
the Canadian Ice Service, the amount of ice in Canada's eastern Arctic
Archipelago decreased by 15 percent between 1969 and 2004 [60].
While
the reduction of summer ice in the Arctic may be a boon to shipping, this same
phenomenon threatens the Arctic ecosystem, most notably polar bears which
depend on ice floes. Subsistence hunters such as the Inuit peoples will find
their livelihoods and cultures increasingly threatened as the ecosystem changes
due to global warming.
The
combined effects of global warming may impact particularly harshly on people
and countries without the resources to mitigate those effects. This may slow economic development and poverty
reduction, and make it harder to achieve the Millennium Development Goals [61],
[62].
In
October 2004 the Working Group on Climate Change and Development, a
coalition of development and environment NGOs, issued a report Up in Smoke on the
effects of climate change on development. This report, and the July 2005
report Africa - Up in Smoke?
predicted increased hunger and disease due to decreased rainfall and severe
weather events, particularly in Africa. These are likely to have severe impacts on development
for those affected.
Secondary
evidence of global warming — reduced snow cover, rising sea levels, weather
changes — provides examples of consequences of global warming that may
influence not only human activities but also ecosystems.
Increasing global temperature means that ecosystems may change; some species may be
forced out of their habitats (possibly to extinction) because of changing
conditions, while others may flourish. Few of the terrestrial ecoregions on Earth could expect
to be unaffected.
Increasing
carbon dioxide may (up to a point) increase ecosystems' productivity; but the
interaction with other aspects of climate
change, means the environmental impact of this is unclear. An increase in
the total amount of biomass produced is not necessarily all good, since biodiversity
can still decrease even though a smaller number of species are flourishing.
Eustatic
sea level rises threaten to contaminate groundwater,
affecting drinking water and agriculture in coastal zones. Increased
evaporation will reduce the effectiveness of reservoirs. Increased extreme
weather means more water falls on hardened ground unable to absorb it - leading
to flash floods instead of a replenishment of soil moisture or groundwater
levels. In some areas, shrinking glaciers threaten the water supply [63].
Higher
temperatures will also increase the demand for water for cooling purposes.
In the
Sahel, there has
been on average a 25 per cent decrease in annual rainfall over the past 30
years.
Rising
temperatures have two opposing direct effects on mortality:
higher temperatures in winter reduce deaths from cold; higher temperatures in
summer increase heat-related deaths. The distribution of these changes
obviously differs. Palutikof et al calculate that in England and Wales for a 1
°C temperature rise the reduced deaths from cold outweigh the increased deaths
from heat, resulting in a reduction in annual average mortality of 7000.
The European heat wave of 2003 killed
22,000–35,000 people, based on normal mortality
rates (Schär and Jendritzky, 2004). It can be said with 90% confidence that
past human influence on climate was responsible for at least half the risk of
the 2003 European summer heat-wave (Stott et al 2004).
If
average temperatures increase by 1 degree Celsius, there will be an estimated
24,000 additional murders in the U.S. each year (as the additional heat stress
leads to more frequent rage). (New Scientist
Global
warming is expected to extend the favourable zones for vectors conveying infectious disease such as malaria [64].
In poorer countries, this may simply lead to higher incidence of such diseases.
In richer countries, where such diseases have been eliminated or kept in check
by vaccination,
draining swamps and using pesticides, the consequences may be felt more in
economic than health terms, if greater spending on preventative measures is
required [65].
The
continued retreat of glaciers will have a number of different quantitative
impacts. In areas that are heavily dependent on water runoff from glaciers that
melt during the warmer summer months, a continuation of the current retreat
will eventually deplete the glacial ice and substantially reduce or eliminate
runoff. A reduction in runoff will affect the ability to irrigate crops
and will reduce summer stream flows necessary to keep dams and reservoirs
replenished. This situation is particularly acute for irrigation in South
America, where numerous artificial lakes are filled almost exclusively by
glacial melt.(BBC) Central Asian countries have also been
historically dependent on the seasonal glacier melt water for irrigation and
drinking supplies. In Norway, the Alps, and the Pacific Northwest of North
America, glacier runoff is important for hydropower.
Many
species of freshwater and saltwater plants and animals are dependent on
glacier-fed waters to ensure a cold water habitat that they have adapted to.
Some species of freshwater fish need cold water to survive and to reproduce,
and this is especially true with Salmon and Cutthroat
trout. Reduced glacier runoff can lead to insufficient stream flow to allow
these species to thrive. Ocean krill, a cornerstone species, prefer cold water and are the
primary food source for aquatic mammals such as the Sperm whale.(CBS) Alterations to the ocean
currents, due to increased freshwater inputs from glacier melt, and the
potential alterations to thermohaline circulation of the worlds
oceans, may impact existing fisheries upon which humans depend as well.
The
potential for major sea level rise is mostly dependent on a significant
melting of the polar ice caps of Greenland and Antarctica, as this is where the
vast majority of glacial ice is located. The British Antarctic Survey has determined
from climate modeling that for at least the next 50 years, snowfall on the
continent of Antarctica should continue to exceed glacial losses from global
warming. The amount of glacial loss on the continent of Antarctica is not
increasing significantly, and it is not known if the continent will experience
a warming or a cooling trend, although the Antarctic Peninsula has warmed in recent years,
causing glacier retreat in that region.(BAS) If all the ice on the polar ice caps
were to melt away, the oceans of the world would rise an estimated 70 m
(229 ft). However, with little major melt expected in Antarctica, sea
level rise of not more than 0.5 m (1.6 ft) is expected through the
21st century, with an average annual rise of 0.0004 m (0.0013 ft) per
year. Thermal expansion of the world's oceans will
contribute, independent of glacial melt, enough to double those figures.(NSIDC2)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_global_warming"