Expert evaluation on
adverse effects of the Pfizer-COVID-19 vaccination
Institute
of Microstructure Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344,
Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen
,
Germany;
podarcissicula@gmail.com
I,
Hervé
Seligmann
, am writing this evaluation at the
request of Haim
Yativ
, for submission to the Israel
Supreme Court.
I
am a biomedical researcher of Israeli and Luxemburgish nationality, with over
100 peer-reviewed international publications. My proven record includes
detecting in widely known and publicized data phenomena that escaped previous
examinations. This includes the descriptions of two previously unknown types of
RNA transcriptions, and of unsuspected structures in the genetic code that link
gene and protein structures. I worked 5 years with Professor Didier
Raoult
at the
Institut
Hospitalo
-
Universitaire
in
Marseille, a first rank microbiology institute in the study of infectious
diseases. I am an independent researcher with no conflicts of interest.
A
priori, the Israeli RNA-based vaccination has several potential risks.
Vaccination works as a prophylactic. Vaccination of individuals while they are
exposed to a pandemic has several adverse consequences. 1. Vaccination
processes usually imply temporary immune system weakening, before
vaccine-induced immunity is acquired. Hence, the vaccinated are fragilized
during the vaccination process, and more likely to develop any diseases against
which the immune system usually defends the body. This includes any viral and
bacterial infections, and individual cancer cells that would escape
extermination by the immune system during this period it is weakened. This
could cause cancer in the medium- or long-term. 2. In the long-term the
antibodies induced by the RNA vaccine will cause autoimmune reactions to the
cells producing the viral protein encoded by the vaccine RNA, and to cells with
natural human proteins resembling the viral protein encoded by the vaccine RNA.
3. Massive vaccination will select vaccine-resistant viral variants with likely
catastrophic effects, especially on the vaccinated. 4. RNA from the vaccine
will in some cases integrate chromosomes of the vaccinated, with potentially
harmful consequences difficult to evaluate at this point.
Reanalyses
of two separate
bodies of data, one published by the Israel Ministry of Health (Table 1) and
one by the team of Dan
Balicer
from
Clalit
(Figure 1,
reanalysed
from
Dagan et al 2021), indicate adverse effects due to the 5-week vaccination
process, as compared to the unvaccinated. Eight among ten authors of Dagan et
al disclose receiving funds for other projects from Pfizer. Pfizer is also a
main funder of the Ministry of Health. Hence, these are not unbiased,
neutral
and independent bodies, which is required for any
study, and especially studies with such crucial consequences.
Tables
1 and 2 show that death rates for each category within and after the
vaccination process are greater than for the unvaccinated, as defined by those
that did not yet get any vaccine dose, and when accounting for differences in
sample sizes and in durations of the different vaccination statuses. This
effect might be confounded by differences in ages for the different groups.
Transparency, meaning additional data in relation to age and risk classes, is
requested to answer this and other questions. Table 1 are data from the
Ministry of Health published in a Ynet article released on February 11. Table 2
is for data released on March 11.
In
addition,
reanalyses
of the data presented in table
S7 of the new England Journal of Medicine, published by the team of Dan
Balicer
(Dagan et al 2021) shows a 3-fold increase in the
daily COVID- 19 detection rate during the first 7 days after first dose
administration. The rate decreases to its initial baseline and
stabilises
at that rate between days 20 to 28 after first
dose administration. It decreases below that rate after that, indicating
vaccine protection from day 35 on after first dose
Community
Mean
Serious Critical Died Total Days
25
56 17 35 1202 7
1
10 1 4 295 9
Died/day/tot
0.00416
Died/
unvacc
>60
years 13075
314
865 183 636 15396
1st
10724
277
742 152 546 12700
0-13d
6235
166
465 81 344 7438 14
0.003303
14.60
>13d
4489
111
277 71 202 5262 7
0.005484
24.23
2nd
2351
37
123 31 90 2696
0-6d
1043
11
57 13 51 1199 7
0.006076
26.85
7-14d
1037
18.38
>14d
271
0.001507
6.66
<60
years 28018
92
166 37 24 28475
1st
25926
87
153 34 22 26347
0-13d
19461
66
124 29 17 19793 14
0.0000613
23.86
>13d
6463
21
29 5 5 6552 7
0.000109
42.40
other
2
2
2nd
2092
5
13 3 2 2128
0-6d
1167
0
4 1 2 1182 7
0.0002417
94.00
7-14d
761
4
8 2 0 779 7 0
>14d
164
1
1 0 0 167 9 0
All
ages 41093
406
1031 220 660 43871
Unvaccinated,
>60 years 0.00022631
Unvaccinated,
<60 years 0.00000257
Low
323 259 147 112
64
24 32
8
138 125 96 29
13
8 4 1 461
Table
1. COVID-19 state according to vaccination status and according to two age
classes, as of February 11. Our additions are
highlighted.
Death rates
per day for unvaccinated are estimated for the 303 days from March 1 to
December 20, before vaccination (data from
worldometer
:
374760 total cases, 3099 deaths). Percentages of cases and deaths for the two
age classes (below and above 60 years) are calculated from age-stratified data
published by the health insurance company
Clalit
since the pandemic started until March 22
2021
(Table
3. Table 4.),
https://www.clalit.co.il/he/your_health/family/Pages/corona_in_israel.aspx
(those above 60 are 11.049% of all COVID19 cases and 91.62% of all COVID19
deaths).
COVID-19
status\
Vacc
. status
Unvacc
.
Community
(asymptomatic)
358454 Light 3257 Medium 1454 Serious 3381 Critical 714 Deceased 1566
Total 368826
1
st
dose 51571 587
466
1083
172
709
54588
2
nd
dose < 7 days 7675
100
54
165
17
84
8095
2
nd
dose > 7 days 4622
106
59
149
37
105
5078
Days 80 21 7
|
~26 (1-52)
|
|||||||||||
Dead per day/total/10000
|
0.531
|
6.18
|
14.82
|
7.95 (210-3.98)
|
||||||||
Mortality increase vs
unvacc
.
|
11.65
|
27.92
|
14.99 (390-7.49)
|
|||||||||
Percent asymptomatic
|
97.19
|
94.47 94.81
|
91.02
|
|||||||||
Percent/day symptomatic
|
0.0352
|
0.2632
|
0.7412
|
0.3454 (8.98-0.17)
|
||||||||
Increase symptomatic/
unvacc
.
|
7.49 21.09
|
9.83 (255.46-4.91)
|
||||||||||
Table
2. Table from
https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/2021/03/11/covid-19-in-israel-nein-die-
impfung-erzeugt-keine-40-mal-hoehere-sterblichkeit/
. Data from the
Health Ministry show the COVID-19 cases for the period from December 20 until
March 10. (Screenshot:
CORRECTIV.Faktencheck
).
Translated from the Hebrew into English. Our additions are
highlighted
.
Mortality rate increases are all statistically significant at P < 0.0001.
Figure
1. Daily vaccinated COVID-19 incidences vs days since 1
st
dose. Baseline: day 1 COVID-19
incidence. *: P < 0.05 vs baseline. Data from Dagan et al N
Eng
J Med 2021; 10.1056/NEJMoa2101765
administration,
which is 14 days after the second dose. COVID-19 detection is the only adverse
event reported by Dagan et al. This suggests an overall weakening of the immune
system within the 3 weeks between doses. Figure 1 suggests that if one decides
to get vaccinated, a hard 5-week quarantine is essential to avoid any exposure
to contamination during the vaccine-induced 3-week immune system fragilization,
as well as a 2-week before 1
st
dose
administration, to avoid vaccinating those that are already infected. Because
vaccination causes a 3-fold increase in COVID-19 infections in the vaccinated
during the first weeks after the first dose, a hard quarantine is required to
decrease this effect, and to avoid further contamination of others during that
period. Balanced evaluation of short- and long-term vaccine benefits requires
cumulating all adverse event types during and after the vaccination process, as
compared to before initiating that process.
Both
data bodies (Table 1 from the Ministry of Health and the data from Dagan et al
in Figure 1) were initially presented as evidence
favouring
vaccination. However, straightforward analyses of these data highlight adverse
effects. They confirm our original suspicion that the vaccination fragilize the
immune system of the vaccinated, not only during the vaccination process, but
even after full vaccination (in Table 1, the fully vaccinated die 15 times more
than the unvaccinated). The raw data on which the Dagan et al publication from
Clalit
is based are unavailable. These data are required
for transparent independent assessment of conclusions of a publication with
such consequences. Current circumstances do not live up, even from far, to this
basic standard requirement.
Before
continuing the massive vaccination project, these adverse effects must be
examined and carefully evaluated vs positive effects. The precautionary
principle is the
first priority
of those responsible
for public health and its urgent application is required at this point,
especially when the whole population of a country, including its youth, is at
stake. Re-evaluation of the project requires age- and vaccine-status-specific
data for all individuals, including those who died and those who did not die.
Such a classical and transparent cost-benefit analysis could prevent
catastrophic consequences, especially considering that the data were collected
and published by teams that are not
absolutely independent
of the company that produces and sells the vaccine.
Hervé
Seligmann
Table
3. Percentages of cases for the age classes, data published by the health
insurance company
Clalit
since the pandemic started
Feb 2020 until March 22
2021
.
From:
https://www.clalit.co.il/he/your_health/family/Pages/corona_in_israel.aspx
Table
4. Percentages of deaths for the age classes, data published by the health
insurance company
Clalit
since the pandemic started
Feb 2020 until March 22
2021
.
From:
https://www.clalit.co.il/he/your_health/family/Pages/corona_in_israel.aspx